Life Insurance Basics |
|
|
|
|
|
Buying a Policy? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How
can I assess the financial strength of an insurance company?
Five independent agencies—A.M. Best,
Fitch, Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Weiss—rate
the financial strength of insurance companies. Each has its
own rating scale, its own rating standards, its own population
of rated companies, and its own distribution of companies
across its scale. Each agency uses numbers or plusses and
minuses to indicate minor variations in rating from another
rating class.
The agencies disagree often enough so that you
should consider a company’s rating from two or more
agencies before judging whether to buy or keep a policy from
that company. Moreover, agencies will announce changes of
ratings on any day. It’s probably prudent to check annually
on the ratings of any company you’re interested in.
Some points for
using the ratings:
- Don’t rely only on what the insurance companies
say about their ratings from these agencies. Companies
are likely to highlight a higher rating from one agency
and ignore a lower one from another agency, or to select
the most favorable comments from a rating agency’s
report.
- To use the ratings from more than one independent agency,
you need to understand that each agency’s rating
code is different from the others. For example, an A+
from A.M. Best is the next-to-top rating of its 15 categories,
but an A+ from Fitch or S&P is their 5th-highest rating
(out of 24 categories for Fitch, and out of 19 categories
for S&P). Moreover, Moody’s doesn’t have
an A+ rating.
However, the ratings can be classified into
“secure” and “vulnerable” mega-categories.
Here, as of August 2004, are the rating scales for each of
the “secure” rating classes, and all the “vulnerable”
classes combined (source, except for Weiss: The Insurance
Forum, September 2004 issue).
Rating Agency |
Category |
Description |
#
of companies in category |
%
of rated companies
in category |
| A.M.
Best |
A++ |
Superior |
97 |
6.4 |
| |
A+ |
Superior |
223 |
14.8 |
| |
A |
Excellent |
292 |
19.3 |
| |
A- |
Excellent |
325 |
21.5 |
| |
B++ |
Very
good |
179 |
11.9 |
| |
B+ |
Very
good |
141 |
9.3 |
| |
B
and lower |
Vulnerable |
253 |
16.8 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Moody's |
Aaa |
Exceptional |
22 |
7.0 |
| |
Aa1 |
Excellent |
20 |
6.4 |
| |
Aa2 |
Excellent |
42 |
13.4 |
| |
Aa3 |
Excellent |
90 |
28.7 |
| |
A1 |
Good |
20 |
6.4 |
| |
A2 |
Good |
36 |
11.5 |
| |
A3 |
Good |
48 |
15.3 |
| |
Baa1 |
Adequate |
14 |
4.5 |
| |
Baa2 |
Adequate |
4 |
1.3 |
| |
Baa3 |
Adequate |
3 |
1.0 |
| |
Ba1
and lower |
Vulnerable |
15 |
4.8 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| S
& P |
AAA |
Extremely
strong |
55 |
8.7 |
| |
AA+ |
Very
strong |
9 |
1.4 |
| |
AA |
Very
strong |
111 |
17.5 |
| |
AA- |
Very
strong |
48 |
7.6 |
| |
A+ |
Strong |
82 |
12.9 |
| |
A |
Strong |
138 |
21.7 |
| |
A- |
Strong |
33 |
5.2 |
| |
BBB+ |
Good |
68 |
10.7 |
| |
BBB |
Good |
39 |
6.2 |
| |
BBB- |
Good |
8 |
1.3 |
| |
BB+
and lower |
Vulnerable |
44 |
7.0 |
| |
|